Below are some excerpts from the EIS and additional recommended talking points - Go to one of the websites below to post your comment our send your own
letter to the address below
COMMENTS ARE DUE MARCH 3, 2010
FoodandWaterWatch.org
CenterforFoodSafety.org
OrganicConsumers.org
PASS THIS ALERT ON TO ALL YOUR NETWORKS
-- For more information, a detailed Fact Sheet from the Center for Food Safety, as well as an electronic version of this alert, go to: www.NationalOrganicCoalition.org
*Tell USDA You Won't Buy GE Contaminated Alfalfa and Alfalfa-Derived Meat & Dairy Products:
USDA claims that consumers will not reject GE contamination of organic alfalfa if the contamination is unintentional or if the GE material is not transmitted to the end milk or meat product.
*Tell USDA to Protect All Farmers, Organic Included, Who Wish to Choose to Grow Non-GE Crops:
Although USDA says it supports "coexistence" of all types of agriculture, USDA refuses to even consider any future for alfalfa that
would include protections from contamination for organic and conventional
farmers and exporters.
*Tell USDA That Protecting Organic Farmers is Its Job and That Relying Solely on Monsanto's Business as Usual "Best Practices" Ensures Widespread GE Contamination:
USDA claims that Monsanto's seed contracts require measures sufficient to prevent GE contamination, and that there is no evidence to the contrary. USDA is
ignoring evidence from widespread GE contamination of Canola, Soy, and
Corn.
*Tell USDA That GE Alfalfa Would Significantly Increase Pesticide Use and Increase Harm to Human Health and the Environment:
USDA admits (correctly) that introduction of Roundup Ready alfalfa will increase Roundup use. However, USDA's claims that the increase is
not significant and that Roundup will replace other, more toxic
herbicides are flat-out wrong.
*Tell USDA That Harm to Small and Organic Farmers from GE Contamination Would be Significant:
USDA concludes that GE alfalfa will cause production to shift to larger farms (that can afford built-in isolation distances) and conventional growers
who are not threatened by GE contamination, but that these economic
shifts are not significant.
HOW TO COMMENT:
1. Send your comments through Center For Food Safety, Food and Water Watch, or Organic Consumers Association, links above.
2. Comments can be filed directly online to USDA at: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480a6b7a1
3. For written, mailed comments please send two copies to: Docket No. APHIS-2007-0044, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737-1238. Please state that your comment refers to Docket
No. APHIS-2007-0044.
For more information, go to: www.NationalOrganicCoalition.org
|